Last week, I had the opportunity to go see Dr. Michio Kaku
speak for Rollins Collge’s Winter Park Institute speaker series. I was
extremely hyped up on going, though I’m no scientist or physicist and only
slightly familiar with him and his work. The lecture was titled “The Next 20
Years: How Science will Revolutionize Society and Our Lives”, which sounded
like it was going to include some secret sort of knowledge that isn’t publicly
known.
It wasn’t. Though Dr. Kaku is an extremely dynamic speaker,
the information he was giving us almost sounded more like the r/science
sub-Reddit on any given day. There were things that were new to me to hear him
expand on briefly, but even then it was information that is already publicly
known. It was an extremely disappointing lecture just based off the information
provided. As a speaker, Dr. Kaku was charismatic, but even he seemed bored by
the information he was sharing.
Sure, the idea that in 7 years from now, X, Y, and Z
technologies will have progressed to a certain point is an interesting thing to
think about. Was it something really that note worthy during a lecture from one
of the top physicists in the world? No.
The key points that I found most interesting and that I
really wish he had expanded on further involved how scientists are using
microbes to eliminate cancer cells, the growth of human organs, and robotics.
Rather than focusing his lecture on anything other than computer chips and how
they’re built into everything nowadays, his lecture was almost like an overview
of a book written about the near future. It started with a very brief history
lesson, but was rushed and didn’t go in depth on any of the topics regarding
the digitization of education and medicine. For christ’s sake, he was reading
off a [very poorly put together] PowerPoint!! For someone who was discussing
the future of technology, he sure was using an outdated method of presentation.
I would have enjoyed his lecture much more had he talked
about something that isn’t so easily found on the internet, or if it wasn’t
such a broad topic that gave little way to focus. Dr. Kaku must have had a very
different public speaking teacher than I, because if my high school or college
public speaking teachers reviewed his speech before he gave it, I’m 98% sure
they would have told him it lacked focus, and that he was trying to cover too
much in too little of time.
I’m not sure if Rollins gave him a topic to speak on or any
sort of limitations, or if it is part of an ongoing tour he is doing, but
regardless, the talk was underwhelming coming from someone with such prestige. The
talk lacked opinion and focus. Dr. Michio Kaku’s charismatic reputation was the
only hype he lived up to, and even that was a disappointment. Maybe next time,
Doctor.
Total word count: 493